<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alright, who shit in my inbox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foo.ca/wp/2008/05/02/alright-who-shit-in-my-inbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foo.ca/wp/2008/05/02/alright-who-shit-in-my-inbox/</link>
	<description>bitch bitch bitch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Goodrich</title>
		<link>http://foo.ca/wp/2008/05/02/alright-who-shit-in-my-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-201617</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Goodrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foo.ca/wp/?p=8515#comment-201617</guid>
		<description>As an intelligent cogent person I&#039;ve never heard so much hot air and piss.

You must love the sound of your own voice, that&#039;s all I can think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an intelligent cogent person I&#8217;ve never heard so much hot air and piss.</p>
<p>You must love the sound of your own voice, that&#8217;s all I can think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NgeliMwenu</title>
		<link>http://foo.ca/wp/2008/05/02/alright-who-shit-in-my-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-200991</link>
		<dc:creator>NgeliMwenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foo.ca/wp/?p=8515#comment-200991</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be &#039;shat&#039; as past tense form of &#039;shit&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be &#8216;shat&#8217; as past tense form of &#8216;shit&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh in California</title>
		<link>http://foo.ca/wp/2008/05/02/alright-who-shit-in-my-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-200925</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh in California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foo.ca/wp/?p=8515#comment-200925</guid>
		<description>Oops! Looks like someone shit on this post, too.

&quot;The Quest for Right, a series of 7 textbooks created for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences.&quot;

Really? I think that most of us with any in-depth knowledge of both are atheists or agnostics. This should be good.


&quot;The several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible: to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution.&quot;

Huh? Evolution isn&#039;t physical science? So 150 years of careful observation and experimentation doesn&#039;t count? Oh, wait, you mean leveling the playing field between those of us who claim that a belief in faeries is scientific and those of us who are grounded in reality. I really doubt you&#039;ve done that, since that would involve lobotomizing everyone in the reality-based community. (Hmm...that&#039;s a scary thought. I bet there are some crazy christians who&#039;d love to do it, too.)

&quot;The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and enlightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately dethrone the unprofitable Darwinian view.&quot;

It&#039;s really, really sad that these people cannot comprehend that the theory of evolution is no more of a world view than the theory of universal gravitation. They give it away with their shitty title, &quot;The Quest for Right&quot;. And what&#039;s &quot;unprofitable&quot; about the ToE, anyway? In what sense do they think it was meant to be profitable?

These people make my brain hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! Looks like someone shit on this post, too.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Quest for Right, a series of 7 textbooks created for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? I think that most of us with any in-depth knowledge of both are atheists or agnostics. This should be good.</p>
<p>&#8220;The several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible: to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution.&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh? Evolution isn&#8217;t physical science? So 150 years of careful observation and experimentation doesn&#8217;t count? Oh, wait, you mean leveling the playing field between those of us who claim that a belief in faeries is scientific and those of us who are grounded in reality. I really doubt you&#8217;ve done that, since that would involve lobotomizing everyone in the reality-based community. (Hmm&#8230;that&#8217;s a scary thought. I bet there are some crazy christians who&#8217;d love to do it, too.)</p>
<p>&#8220;The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and enlightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately dethrone the unprofitable Darwinian view.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really, really sad that these people cannot comprehend that the theory of evolution is no more of a world view than the theory of universal gravitation. They give it away with their shitty title, &#8220;The Quest for Right&#8221;. And what&#8217;s &#8220;unprofitable&#8221; about the ToE, anyway? In what sense do they think it was meant to be profitable?</p>
<p>These people make my brain hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic&#8217;s Circle #86: A Bitch of an Edition &#171; The Skepbitch</title>
		<link>http://foo.ca/wp/2008/05/02/alright-who-shit-in-my-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-200904</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic&#8217;s Circle #86: A Bitch of an Edition &#171; The Skepbitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foo.ca/wp/?p=8515#comment-200904</guid>
		<description>[...] Murray of bankrupt artist v.3 provides the votive offering: Alright, who shit in my inbox? This recounts his Facebook War over evolution, inspired by Expelled: No Intelligence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Murray of bankrupt artist v.3 provides the votive offering: Alright, who shit in my inbox? This recounts his Facebook War over evolution, inspired by Expelled: No Intelligence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. David Parsons</title>
		<link>http://foo.ca/wp/2008/05/02/alright-who-shit-in-my-inbox/comment-page-1/#comment-200843</link>
		<dc:creator>C. David Parsons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foo.ca/wp/?p=8515#comment-200843</guid>
		<description>THE BIGGER PICTURE IS NOT INTELLIGENT DESIGN. The reason is elementary:  the Discovery Institute and other ID proponents leave out the Triune God, Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. Hence, Richard Dawkins can make the case for “aliens” seeding the earth.
  
There is a better, far superior way.
  
The Quest for Right, a series of 7 textbooks created for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences. The several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible:  to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution. The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and enlightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately dethrone the unprofitable Darwinian view.
 
A review:
  
&quot;I am amazed at the breadth of the investigation - scientific history, biblical studies, geology, biology, geography, astronomy, chemistry, paleontology, and so forth - and find the style of writing to be quite lucid and aimed clearly at a general, lay audience.&quot; ― Mark Roberts, former Editor of Biblical Reference Books, Thomas Nelson Publishers.   

Visit the official website for additional information: http://questforright.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE BIGGER PICTURE IS NOT INTELLIGENT DESIGN. The reason is elementary:  the Discovery Institute and other ID proponents leave out the Triune God, Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. Hence, Richard Dawkins can make the case for “aliens” seeding the earth.</p>
<p>There is a better, far superior way.</p>
<p>The Quest for Right, a series of 7 textbooks created for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences. The several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible:  to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution. The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and enlightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately dethrone the unprofitable Darwinian view.</p>
<p>A review:</p>
<p>&#8220;I am amazed at the breadth of the investigation &#8211; scientific history, biblical studies, geology, biology, geography, astronomy, chemistry, paleontology, and so forth &#8211; and find the style of writing to be quite lucid and aimed clearly at a general, lay audience.&#8221; ― Mark Roberts, former Editor of Biblical Reference Books, Thomas Nelson Publishers.   </p>
<p>Visit the official website for additional information: <a href="http://questforright.com" rel="nofollow">http://questforright.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

